Once Upon a Time In Hollywood Review

Quentin Tarantino’s ode to Hollywood’s past might just be his most eccentric offering to date.

The writer/director’s love for 1960s era Tinseltown is writ large throughout Once Upon a Time In Hollywood. The neon movie theatre lights, glamourous Playboy Mansion parties, Steve McQueen mingling with Roman Polanski and Cadillacs roaming the strip; this is Tarantino’s rose-tinted vision of Los Angeles as it was, on the cusp of change and decline.

Gorgeous costume and production design lend themselves perfectly to giving the film a tangible sense of time and place, but underneath the glitz, there’s a dark storm approaching. Charles Manson’s cult followers fall deeper under his influence, with the film ticking closer to the fateful night in August ’69 when his “family” committed the murder of actress Sharon Tate (Margot Robbie). Though Manson himself appears just once (played by Damon Herriman), his disciples litter the streets of Hollywood serving as looming reminders of the inevitable tragedy to come.

Margot Robbie as Sharon Tate.

And yet, they’re somewhat of a red herring, their presence largely secondary to the main crux of Once Upon a Time’s story. And if the Manson Family are disconnected from the core narrative for a solid portion, then by association, so is Sharon Tate. Margot Robbie’s scenes act as a celebration of Tate’s talent, rather than a teary-eyed remembrance of a tragic figure. But in spite of her doing an excellent job of injecting these moments with life, they ultimately feel isolated, especially in light of the direction the film eventually takes. Even more so than the Manson Family, Tate’s inclusion feels like a bluff. Tarantino has previous when it comes to revising history, something which he’s not afraid to play with here.  

Instead, the focus is on Leonardo DiCaprio’s fictional ailing actor Rick Dalton and his stunt man/driver/best friend Cliff Booth (Brad Pitt). It’s in time spent with these two, as a pair and individually, that the film shines brightest, with Tarantino comfortable in allowing his characters to drive the narrative, as prone to tangents as it becomes. The movie flits from extended flashbacks to brief interludes and films within the film, chopping between smaller tales in the larger narrative in a way reminiscent of the Coen Brothers’ Hail, Caesar!, and sharing structural similarities with Tarantino’s own early pictures (in particular Pulp Fiction).

Brad Pitt as Cliff Booth and Leonardo DiCaprio as Rick Dalton.

But whereas his 1994 sophomore effort was a tightly constructed tale, this sees Tarantino on looser form, allowing for a film which leans less heavily on plot, and rather puts its characters front and centre as they live their off-kilter lives. Pitt’s Cliff Booth oozes cool, but DiCaprio’s emotionally unstable artist with an ego Rick Dalton is an absolute treat. Even if their collective tale spins its wheels a bit, Rick and Cliff aren’t a duo that you’re likely to grow tired of any time soon, particularly when they’re paired with the usual hallmarks of a Tarantino movie: quick-witted dialogue, violence and a belting soundtrack. 

Still, it doesn’t manage to reach the heady heights of Tarantino’s best work, and almost frustratingly so. There are signs that this could have been up there with his greats; sequences in which Rick and Cliff’s world collides with the Manson Family are the highlights, one tense trip to a cultist ranch, and a brawl of preposterously gruesome, wild, hyper-violent, comedically farcical levels. But instead, this falls somewhere into the mid-tier of his filmography. Still, that’s better than most mere filmmaking mortals can hope for.

Rating (out of 5):

5 Comments Add yours

  1. Dan Bullock says:

    See, I didn’t like the finale really and was slightly concerned about the sheer level of laughter around me. While it’s definitely comedic in its absurdity, it ruined the feeling of the entire film before it.

    Yes, it was probably going to happen, I knew that somewhere, but just following Rick and Cliff was interesting enough already, even though it definitely meanders.

    Margot was great but, yeah, brutally underused. Just there to look amazing, as she does, and while she still brings depth to the character, especially in the cinema scene, it felt like a separation from everything else. Maybe that was QT’s intention though, to give her a different life.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Luke Kent says:

      Definitely, I saw QT’s approach with Sharon Tate as his celebration of her life and career, an opportunity for him to rewrite history and “remove” a dark part of Hollywood’s past. Which I suppose is why Cliff and Rick’s takedown of the Manson clan is so cathartically violent (as you say though, it’s certainly a massive tonal shift). That and Cliff’s trip to the ranch were the standout moments for me though, and had easily had the most dramatic tension.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Dan Bullock says:

    The ranch trip was so well done, flipped all the usual on its head really. But, yeah, still unsure about the finale, will obviously rewatch though and wonder if it feels different when you know it’s coming.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Sam Simon says:

    Nice review! It’s a good movie, as you correctly pointed out, but I also think that Tarantino has done better things in the past.

    I’ve put a link to your review below the one I wrote on my blog, I hope it’s fine for you!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Luke Kent says:

      Of course, thanks for the share, I’ll check your review out! It’s not Tarantino’s best, but great performances, fun characters, top dialogue!

      Liked by 1 person

Share your thoughts!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.