Mother! Review

Well. Where to start with this one?

As much as Mother! loses its way around the midpoint, it is without a doubt a film which warrants discussion. It’s certainly likely to divide audiences; those coming for a straightforward psychological thriller will undoubtedly be disappointed (and probably quite confused). Those more familiar with director Darren Aronofsky’s previous work will be prepped for something with a degree of complexity, and that we get in spades. Myself, I fall into the latter camp. I was ready to be dizzied, emotionally battered and surprised. I was to an extent, yet mostly I just ended up a bit bewildered by it all. A similar state to that which Jennifer Lawrence’s Mother finds herself in for much of the film’s runtime.

Which is no coincidence. There’s always a sense that the characters who surround her are all in on a secret that she’s not privy to. And we, the audience, are bound to her from the off, the camera following her intently, replicating her point of view. We know what she knows, and quite regularly, that’s not all too much. It’s exactly this which helps to build increasing levels of tension and intrigue throughout the quiet, creepy and contemplative first half. Whilst this 50% of Mother! is beautifully restrained, the remaining 50%, on the other hand, plummets into loud and excessive chaos. Lawrence’s performance mirrors this. In the first half, she’s at level career best as a put-upon, perfect housewife whose life is spiralling out around her. For the remainder, however, all of the subtlety and nuance she’d brought to the table is replaced by ceaseless wailing and hysterics.

Jennifer Lawrence as Mother and Javier Bardem as Him.

Which is all thanks to Mother’s rising exasperation with her poet husband Him (Javier Bardem), his constant need for fame, and the lack of attention which he pays to her. All of which begins to come to a head when Ed Harris’s strange visitor arrives on the doorstep of the couple’s recently renovated, apparently living home. It all slowly escalates from here. Michelle Pfeiffer, Harris’s wife, rocks up unannounced, imposing herself on Mother and Him, highlighting fractures in her host’s relationship. Him does anything to avoid appeasing his wife, while Mother becomes an outsider in the house she built. The quartet bounces off each other wonderfully; seeing Pfeiffer and Harris antagonise with glee is particularly fun. So it’s disappointing when they then simply disappear, shuffled to the background for an ever-more surreal succession of wellwishers, adoring fans, managers, press and cultists.

I feel as though I should stress just how bizarre (and tiresome) it all gets. Whether intended as comedically absurdist or loftily thought-provoking, it becomes polarising, to say the least. In fact, the final thirty minutes or so I deeply, deeply disliked. Enough so to seriously unravel a considerable amount of the goodwill that Mother! had built up prior to this. Still, to write the film off entirely feels like a disservice. It’s bold, original filmmaking that takes a big swing and fails to connect cleanly. Aronofsky has delved into the human psyche with greater effectiveness in Black Swan and Requiem for a Dream. He’s gone bigger in scale with Noah and The Fountain. This perhaps trumps the lot of them in terms of ambition, but in doing so becomes somewhat of a wildly ambitious mess.

Rating (out of 5):

Advertisements

6 Comments Add yours

  1. Jay says:

    I agree, it’s just too much of an onslaught, and you’re definitely right about it getting tiresome. I thought it was tough during the first half, so imagine how I felt during the second!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Luke Kent says:

      😂 I feel for you! I was actually quite enjoying it until about midway through, and grew increasingly baffled by it from there on in. I can’t imagine I’ll be watching it again any time soon!

      Like

  2. Kariyanine says:

    I want to see it but I’m thinking making a trip to the theater for it might be off the table as word is pretty tepid and there are other things to see.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Luke Kent says:

      It’s an acquired taste I’d say, plenty to discuss and digest, but not easy watching!

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Those who most get lost in this film are those who are the most logical thinkers. To get what it offers, you need to let go and allow your imagination to create the bigger story. The metaphors are absolutely articulate about the destructive power of ideologues and the perpetual diempowerment of womanhood. It is a masterpiece of political and religous satire.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Luke Kent says:

      I felt that it handled itself with much more subtlety in the first half, but found the second half to be heavy handed in comparison. It’s certainly ambitious though, my favourite thing to have come out of the film is the debate it’s created. I generally enjoy Aronofsky’s films (barring Noah (perhaps it’s the religious allegories putting me off?)), I just found the final act of this too overbearing for my liking. 😀

      Like

Share your thoughts!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s